How to send large text (String) as response from a REST service to REST client in Java?
I have a restful application, where I need to send text as response to REST client. Now the problem is that sometimes text could be huge nearly 100000 characters.
Can I send large data as normal, plain text?
How to send it through the network to my REST client?
java rest
add a comment |
I have a restful application, where I need to send text as response to REST client. Now the problem is that sometimes text could be huge nearly 100000 characters.
Can I send large data as normal, plain text?
How to send it through the network to my REST client?
java rest
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
1
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
add a comment |
I have a restful application, where I need to send text as response to REST client. Now the problem is that sometimes text could be huge nearly 100000 characters.
Can I send large data as normal, plain text?
How to send it through the network to my REST client?
java rest
I have a restful application, where I need to send text as response to REST client. Now the problem is that sometimes text could be huge nearly 100000 characters.
Can I send large data as normal, plain text?
How to send it through the network to my REST client?
java rest
java rest
edited Nov 16 '18 at 12:41
Karol Dowbecki
26.3k93759
26.3k93759
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:59
yatheendra k vyatheendra k v
234
234
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
1
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
add a comment |
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
1
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
1
1
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple
0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple
0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You should use HTTP compression by using Accept-Encoding
request header and Content-Encoding
response header:
GET /your-url HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
This will make the compression transparent for most REST API clients. GZIP should be handled out of the box by most client libraries plus it can be disabled by not setting Accept-Encoding
header.
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337483%2fhow-to-send-large-text-string-as-response-from-a-rest-service-to-rest-client-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should use HTTP compression by using Accept-Encoding
request header and Content-Encoding
response header:
GET /your-url HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
This will make the compression transparent for most REST API clients. GZIP should be handled out of the box by most client libraries plus it can be disabled by not setting Accept-Encoding
header.
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
add a comment |
You should use HTTP compression by using Accept-Encoding
request header and Content-Encoding
response header:
GET /your-url HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
This will make the compression transparent for most REST API clients. GZIP should be handled out of the box by most client libraries plus it can be disabled by not setting Accept-Encoding
header.
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
add a comment |
You should use HTTP compression by using Accept-Encoding
request header and Content-Encoding
response header:
GET /your-url HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
This will make the compression transparent for most REST API clients. GZIP should be handled out of the box by most client libraries plus it can be disabled by not setting Accept-Encoding
header.
You should use HTTP compression by using Accept-Encoding
request header and Content-Encoding
response header:
GET /your-url HTTP/1.1
Host: www.example.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
This will make the compression transparent for most REST API clients. GZIP should be handled out of the box by most client libraries plus it can be disabled by not setting Accept-Encoding
header.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:07
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.3k93759
26.3k93759
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
add a comment |
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
1
1
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
Note that compression over HTTPS can leave you vulnernable to BREACH attacks.
– Eric Stein
Nov 16 '18 at 16:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337483%2fhow-to-send-large-text-string-as-response-from-a-rest-service-to-rest-client-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A POST response has generally no size limitations so 100000 characters should not be a problem. There can, however, be a limitation due to the web server and/or implementation you use.
– T A
Nov 16 '18 at 12:06
1
100,000 characters of ASCII text is only 98kB (allow a bit more for unicode) - people transfer much larger chunks of data over the internet all the time (think video)
– MTCoster
Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
@MTCoster thank you soo much. That is a valid point
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
Thanks a lot for the information @TA .It helped to proceed.
– yatheendra k v
Nov 16 '18 at 12:38
For HTTP connections I'd recommend chuncked transfer encodings, especially for larger payloads, as this allows you to send data to the client continiously and end the stream with a simple
0
– Roman Vottner
Nov 16 '18 at 13:08