How does the “this” keyword work?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this work and when should it be used?
javascript this
|
show 4 more comments
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this work and when should it be used?
javascript this
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthispeter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthiskeyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this work and when should it be used?
javascript this
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this work and when should it be used?
javascript this
javascript this
edited Feb 8 '15 at 16:10
JJJ
29.3k147693
29.3k147693
asked Jun 27 '10 at 13:12
Maxim GershkovichMaxim Gershkovich
18.2k33116210
18.2k33116210
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthispeter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthiskeyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthispeter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthiskeyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
6
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
this peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
this peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
1
An interesting explanation of
this keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
An interesting explanation of
this keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this:
§11.1.1 Thethiskeyword
The
thiskeyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window (§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval() is. Basically, eval(...) is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...) or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...); is an indirect call to eval(). See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval() call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod() or the equivalent obj["myMethod"](), then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg.
In the case of the Array.prototype functions, the given callbackfn is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this...refer(s) to the values ofthisin the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
thisat the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()is executed? Why?
obj— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun/obj.myMethodis not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
thisisobj. However, in the eval code,myFunis not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindowfor the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call(), which acceptsthisArgas the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeoutexample has athisofwindow(global).
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthisis within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()),thisiswindowwithin the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
The this keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this in global context, it is bound to global object (window in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1 is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this keyword inside an object method, this is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
newoperator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new keyword), this inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
thiswhich will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passing elements ofargsArrayas its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Returns the reference to the functionfunwiththisinside fun bound toobj1and parameters offunbound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,....- By now the difference between
apply,callandbindmust have become apparent.applyallows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlengthproperty and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascallallows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapplyandcallimmediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bindsimply returns the function bound to the specifiedthisvalue and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
thisdirectly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListenermethod or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick. - Similarly, when you use
thisdirectly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
thisindirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthisis not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthismust always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1(), so that meansf1()is already attached towindowobject, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this would be logged as window. This is because window is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict"; to the beginning of the function declaration, this would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this would, in this case just log undefined, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach and slice, you should already know that the this variable in that case refers to the Object on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object, including Arrays and Functions). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object contains a property which holds a Function, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this variable set to the Object it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new keyword.
- Calling the function with the
newkeyword would immediately initialze anObjectof typePerson. - The constructor of this
Objecthas its constructor set toPerson. Also, note thattypeof awalwould returnObjectonly. - This new
Objectwould be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype. This means that any method or property in thePersonprototype would be available to all instances ofPerson, includingawal. - The function
Personitself is now invoked;thisbeing a reference to the newly constructed objectawal.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor functions. They are just normal functions, and new can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call and apply
So yeah, since functions are also Objects (and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function, and two of its many methods are call and apply, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this in the function foo as a reference to thisArg. All other parameters passed to call are passed to the function foo as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3] in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this in any function.
apply is almost the same as call accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call call can be translated to apply like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call and apply can override the value of this set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind!
bind is a brother of call and apply. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind and call/apply is that both call and apply will actually invoke the function. bind, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg and arguments pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call and apply, bind will also over-ride the value of this set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call and apply would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this from the original scope. So we 'copied' this to that and used the copy instead of this. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
thisby default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
newkeyword? - How do we manipulate
thiswithcallandapply? - Using
bind. - Copying
thisto solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenewkeyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethiskeyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
thisis not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthisis determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
this in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this topic.
How is the value of this determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window object. Therefore, this in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window object.
When use strict, this in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined.
The this keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this, 2) we assign a method that uses this to a variable, 3) a function that uses this is passed as a callback function, and 4) this is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)

What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind(), it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call, func.apply or func.bind.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthisin Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call,func.bindetc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
thisdoes not reference a function's scope.thiswill reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined), which as you've said can be changed using.call()or.apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,thisand scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),thisand scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethisin an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthisnever refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Here is one good source of this in JavaScript.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
thisis thewindowobject
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
nodeusing the repl,thisis the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
nodeexecuting from a script,thisat the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this in a function that is not called with new references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;, in which case this will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new the this will be a new context, it will not reference the global this.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype property. You access those values using this.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval to access this.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with to add this to the current scope to read and write to values on this without referring to this explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - objel.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // objel.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - objel.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this value.
When having troubles identifying this, do not ask yourself:
Where is
thistaken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
thiswhere the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
this is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a() was executed in the global context which is the window.
With Constructor
this can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person() is executed, a completely new object is created. Person is called and its this is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new keyword, whatIsThis referes to the most global context it can find(window)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply().call()and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = thismeans in JavaScript
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
I have a different take on this from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call.
If you just call a function then this is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectIn other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectwhich means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like + and - and *. There is also the dot operator which is .
The . operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barIn other words bar.foo() translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barAgain these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a for the property b. If b is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class keyword. For the purposes of this though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a for property b if it finds property b on the object or in it's prototype chain if b ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b references will be called using the call method and passing a as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this before calling another function and then call it with the . (dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); Following the translation to use call, obj.bar() becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);. When we enter the bar function we call foo but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this is that inner object.
This is what both bind and => functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar above that explicitly sets this before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this is set to whatever you pass to bind.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});Note that if functionObject.bind did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the => operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis but unlike bind the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this happens to be when the => operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo() translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj); which means the arrow operator inside foo will bind obj to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b. b() will work as it always has as b.call(window) or b.call(undefined) calling the new invisible function that foo created. That invisible function ignores the this passed into it and passes obj as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
Summary this Javascript:
- The value of
thisis determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
thisis determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (windowin global space) - In event listeners the value of
thisrefers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
newkeyword the value ofthisrefers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
thiswith the functions:call,apply,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike() function is printing the this.name which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object).
In the above code snippet, when function bike() gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike() call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike() gets called with the execution context as obj1 so this.name became obj1.name. Same with obj2.bike() call where the execution context of function bike() is obj2.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike() is an example of default binding. obj1.bike() and obj2.bike() are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1 but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike(), the context of execution is obj2 so obj2.name gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call() method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike() and bike.call(obj2) both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1 and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1); These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this:
§11.1.1 Thethiskeyword
The
thiskeyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window (§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval() is. Basically, eval(...) is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...) or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...); is an indirect call to eval(). See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval() call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod() or the equivalent obj["myMethod"](), then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg.
In the case of the Array.prototype functions, the given callbackfn is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this...refer(s) to the values ofthisin the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
thisat the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()is executed? Why?
obj— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun/obj.myMethodis not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
thisisobj. However, in the eval code,myFunis not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindowfor the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call(), which acceptsthisArgas the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeoutexample has athisofwindow(global).
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthisis within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()),thisiswindowwithin the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this:
§11.1.1 Thethiskeyword
The
thiskeyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window (§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval() is. Basically, eval(...) is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...) or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...); is an indirect call to eval(). See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval() call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod() or the equivalent obj["myMethod"](), then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg.
In the case of the Array.prototype functions, the given callbackfn is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this...refer(s) to the values ofthisin the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
thisat the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()is executed? Why?
obj— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun/obj.myMethodis not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
thisisobj. However, in the eval code,myFunis not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindowfor the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call(), which acceptsthisArgas the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeoutexample has athisofwindow(global).
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthisis within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()),thisiswindowwithin the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this:
§11.1.1 Thethiskeyword
The
thiskeyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window (§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval() is. Basically, eval(...) is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...) or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...); is an indirect call to eval(). See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval() call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod() or the equivalent obj["myMethod"](), then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg.
In the case of the Array.prototype functions, the given callbackfn is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this...refer(s) to the values ofthisin the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
thisat the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()is executed? Why?
obj— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun/obj.myMethodis not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
thisisobj. However, in the eval code,myFunis not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindowfor the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call(), which acceptsthisArgas the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this:
§11.1.1 Thethiskeyword
The
thiskeyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window (§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval() is. Basically, eval(...) is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...) or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...); is an indirect call to eval(). See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval() call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod() or the equivalent obj["myMethod"](), then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg.
In the case of the Array.prototype functions, the given callbackfn is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this...refer(s) to the values ofthisin the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
thisat the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()is executed? Why?
obj— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun/obj.myMethodis not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
thisisobj. However, in the eval code,myFunis not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindowfor the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
thisat the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call(), which acceptsthisArgas the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
edited Jan 22 at 14:19
community wiki
20 revs, 5 users 54%
Daniel Trebbien
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeoutexample has athisofwindow(global).
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthisis within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()),thisiswindowwithin the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeoutexample has athisofwindow(global).
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthisis within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()),thisiswindowwithin the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that the
setTimeout example has a this of window(global).– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that the
setTimeout example has a this of window(global).– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out what
this is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g. someObject.someMethod()), this is window within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out what
this is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g. someObject.someMethod()), this is window within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
The this keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this in global context, it is bound to global object (window in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1 is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this keyword inside an object method, this is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
newoperator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new keyword), this inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
thiswhich will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passing elements ofargsArrayas its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Returns the reference to the functionfunwiththisinside fun bound toobj1and parameters offunbound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,....- By now the difference between
apply,callandbindmust have become apparent.applyallows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlengthproperty and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascallallows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapplyandcallimmediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bindsimply returns the function bound to the specifiedthisvalue and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
thisdirectly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListenermethod or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick. - Similarly, when you use
thisdirectly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
thisindirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthisis not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthismust always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1(), so that meansf1()is already attached towindowobject, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
The this keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this in global context, it is bound to global object (window in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1 is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this keyword inside an object method, this is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
newoperator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new keyword), this inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
thiswhich will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passing elements ofargsArrayas its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Returns the reference to the functionfunwiththisinside fun bound toobj1and parameters offunbound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,....- By now the difference between
apply,callandbindmust have become apparent.applyallows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlengthproperty and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascallallows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapplyandcallimmediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bindsimply returns the function bound to the specifiedthisvalue and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
thisdirectly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListenermethod or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick. - Similarly, when you use
thisdirectly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
thisindirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthisis not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthismust always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1(), so that meansf1()is already attached towindowobject, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
The this keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this in global context, it is bound to global object (window in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1 is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this keyword inside an object method, this is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
newoperator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new keyword), this inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
thiswhich will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passing elements ofargsArrayas its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Returns the reference to the functionfunwiththisinside fun bound toobj1and parameters offunbound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,....- By now the difference between
apply,callandbindmust have become apparent.applyallows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlengthproperty and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascallallows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapplyandcallimmediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bindsimply returns the function bound to the specifiedthisvalue and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
thisdirectly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListenermethod or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick. - Similarly, when you use
thisdirectly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
thisindirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
The this keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this in global context, it is bound to global object (window in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1 is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this keyword inside an object method, this is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
newoperator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new keyword), this inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
thiswhich will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passing elements ofargsArrayas its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Setsobj1as the value ofthisinsidefun()and callsfun()passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])- Returns the reference to the functionfunwiththisinside fun bound toobj1and parameters offunbound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,....- By now the difference between
apply,callandbindmust have become apparent.applyallows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlengthproperty and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascallallows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapplyandcallimmediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bindsimply returns the function bound to the specifiedthisvalue and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
thisdirectly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListenermethod or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick. - Similarly, when you use
thisdirectly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
thisindirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
edited May 7 '15 at 13:42
Jonathan Lin
11.5k45052
11.5k45052
answered Jul 7 '13 at 17:32
Mahesha999Mahesha999
7,3871962118
7,3871962118
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthisis not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthismust always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1(), so that meansf1()is already attached towindowobject, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthisis not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthismust always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1(), so that meansf1()is already attached towindowobject, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value of
this is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value of this must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make call window.f1(), so that means f1() is already attached to window object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value of
this is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value of this must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make call window.f1(), so that means f1() is already attached to window object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of called
window.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it using window.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of called
window.fn, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it using window.fn, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this would be logged as window. This is because window is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict"; to the beginning of the function declaration, this would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this would, in this case just log undefined, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach and slice, you should already know that the this variable in that case refers to the Object on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object, including Arrays and Functions). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object contains a property which holds a Function, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this variable set to the Object it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new keyword.
- Calling the function with the
newkeyword would immediately initialze anObjectof typePerson. - The constructor of this
Objecthas its constructor set toPerson. Also, note thattypeof awalwould returnObjectonly. - This new
Objectwould be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype. This means that any method or property in thePersonprototype would be available to all instances ofPerson, includingawal. - The function
Personitself is now invoked;thisbeing a reference to the newly constructed objectawal.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor functions. They are just normal functions, and new can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call and apply
So yeah, since functions are also Objects (and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function, and two of its many methods are call and apply, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this in the function foo as a reference to thisArg. All other parameters passed to call are passed to the function foo as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3] in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this in any function.
apply is almost the same as call accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call call can be translated to apply like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call and apply can override the value of this set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind!
bind is a brother of call and apply. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind and call/apply is that both call and apply will actually invoke the function. bind, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg and arguments pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call and apply, bind will also over-ride the value of this set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call and apply would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this from the original scope. So we 'copied' this to that and used the copy instead of this. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
thisby default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
newkeyword? - How do we manipulate
thiswithcallandapply? - Using
bind. - Copying
thisto solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenewkeyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this would be logged as window. This is because window is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict"; to the beginning of the function declaration, this would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this would, in this case just log undefined, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach and slice, you should already know that the this variable in that case refers to the Object on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object, including Arrays and Functions). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object contains a property which holds a Function, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this variable set to the Object it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new keyword.
- Calling the function with the
newkeyword would immediately initialze anObjectof typePerson. - The constructor of this
Objecthas its constructor set toPerson. Also, note thattypeof awalwould returnObjectonly. - This new
Objectwould be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype. This means that any method or property in thePersonprototype would be available to all instances ofPerson, includingawal. - The function
Personitself is now invoked;thisbeing a reference to the newly constructed objectawal.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor functions. They are just normal functions, and new can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call and apply
So yeah, since functions are also Objects (and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function, and two of its many methods are call and apply, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this in the function foo as a reference to thisArg. All other parameters passed to call are passed to the function foo as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3] in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this in any function.
apply is almost the same as call accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call call can be translated to apply like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call and apply can override the value of this set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind!
bind is a brother of call and apply. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind and call/apply is that both call and apply will actually invoke the function. bind, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg and arguments pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call and apply, bind will also over-ride the value of this set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call and apply would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this from the original scope. So we 'copied' this to that and used the copy instead of this. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
thisby default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
newkeyword? - How do we manipulate
thiswithcallandapply? - Using
bind. - Copying
thisto solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenewkeyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this would be logged as window. This is because window is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict"; to the beginning of the function declaration, this would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this would, in this case just log undefined, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach and slice, you should already know that the this variable in that case refers to the Object on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object, including Arrays and Functions). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object contains a property which holds a Function, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this variable set to the Object it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new keyword.
- Calling the function with the
newkeyword would immediately initialze anObjectof typePerson. - The constructor of this
Objecthas its constructor set toPerson. Also, note thattypeof awalwould returnObjectonly. - This new
Objectwould be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype. This means that any method or property in thePersonprototype would be available to all instances ofPerson, includingawal. - The function
Personitself is now invoked;thisbeing a reference to the newly constructed objectawal.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor functions. They are just normal functions, and new can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call and apply
So yeah, since functions are also Objects (and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function, and two of its many methods are call and apply, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this in the function foo as a reference to thisArg. All other parameters passed to call are passed to the function foo as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3] in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this in any function.
apply is almost the same as call accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call call can be translated to apply like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call and apply can override the value of this set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind!
bind is a brother of call and apply. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind and call/apply is that both call and apply will actually invoke the function. bind, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg and arguments pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call and apply, bind will also over-ride the value of this set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call and apply would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this from the original scope. So we 'copied' this to that and used the copy instead of this. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
thisby default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
newkeyword? - How do we manipulate
thiswithcallandapply? - Using
bind. - Copying
thisto solve nested-scope issues.
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this would be logged as window. This is because window is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict"; to the beginning of the function declaration, this would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this would, in this case just log undefined, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach and slice, you should already know that the this variable in that case refers to the Object on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object, including Arrays and Functions). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object contains a property which holds a Function, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this variable set to the Object it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new keyword.
- Calling the function with the
newkeyword would immediately initialze anObjectof typePerson. - The constructor of this
Objecthas its constructor set toPerson. Also, note thattypeof awalwould returnObjectonly. - This new
Objectwould be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype. This means that any method or property in thePersonprototype would be available to all instances ofPerson, includingawal. - The function
Personitself is now invoked;thisbeing a reference to the newly constructed objectawal.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor functions. They are just normal functions, and new can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call and apply
So yeah, since functions are also Objects (and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function, and two of its many methods are call and apply, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this in the function foo as a reference to thisArg. All other parameters passed to call are passed to the function foo as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3] in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this in any function.
apply is almost the same as call accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call call can be translated to apply like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call and apply can override the value of this set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind!
bind is a brother of call and apply. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind and call/apply is that both call and apply will actually invoke the function. bind, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg and arguments pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call and apply, bind will also over-ride the value of this set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call and apply would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this from the original scope. So we 'copied' this to that and used the copy instead of this. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
thisby default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
newkeyword? - How do we manipulate
thiswithcallandapply? - Using
bind. - Copying
thisto solve nested-scope issues.
edited Oct 27 '14 at 9:40
Madara Uchiha♦
119k43214263
119k43214263
answered Oct 26 '14 at 15:07
user3459110user3459110
5,82522033
5,82522033
1
Why is there a section about thenewkeyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
1
Why is there a section about thenewkeyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
1
1
Why is there a section about the
new keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
Why is there a section about the
new keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethiskeyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
thisis not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthisis determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethiskeyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
thisis not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthisis determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
edited Oct 29 '14 at 5:00
Daniel Alexiuc
9,81884969
9,81884969
answered Jun 27 '10 at 14:10
arunjitsingharunjitsingh
2,2651715
2,2651715
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethiskeyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
thisis not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthisis determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethiskeyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
thisis not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthisis determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
6
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
11
The
this keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
The
this keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
7
this is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), but this is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
this is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), but this is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
this in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
this in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
this in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this will refer to the window object.
this in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this will refer to the window object.
answered Oct 6 '13 at 19:46
SephSeph
8601017
8601017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this topic.
How is the value of this determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window object. Therefore, this in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window object.
When use strict, this in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined.
The this keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this, 2) we assign a method that uses this to a variable, 3) a function that uses this is passed as a callback function, and 4) this is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)

What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind(), it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this topic.
How is the value of this determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window object. Therefore, this in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window object.
When use strict, this in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined.
The this keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this, 2) we assign a method that uses this to a variable, 3) a function that uses this is passed as a callback function, and 4) this is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)

What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind(), it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this topic.
How is the value of this determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window object. Therefore, this in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window object.
When use strict, this in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined.
The this keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this, 2) we assign a method that uses this to a variable, 3) a function that uses this is passed as a callback function, and 4) this is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)

What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind(), it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this topic.
How is the value of this determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window object. Therefore, this in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window object.
When use strict, this in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined.
The this keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this, 2) we assign a method that uses this to a variable, 3) a function that uses this is passed as a callback function, and 4) this is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)

What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind(), it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
answered Oct 30 '14 at 3:58
carlodursocarlodurso
2,72042037
2,72042037
add a comment |
add a comment |
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call, func.apply or func.bind.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthisin Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call,func.bindetc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
thisdoes not reference a function's scope.thiswill reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined), which as you've said can be changed using.call()or.apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,thisand scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),thisand scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethisin an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthisnever refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call, func.apply or func.bind.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthisin Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call,func.bindetc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
thisdoes not reference a function's scope.thiswill reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined), which as you've said can be changed using.call()or.apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,thisand scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),thisand scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethisin an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthisnever refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call, func.apply or func.bind.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call, func.apply or func.bind.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
edited Apr 26 '17 at 3:54
RobG
99.5k19111146
99.5k19111146
answered Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
blockheadblockhead
7,65713360
7,65713360
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthisin Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call,func.bindetc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
thisdoes not reference a function's scope.thiswill reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined), which as you've said can be changed using.call()or.apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,thisand scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),thisand scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethisin an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthisnever refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthisin Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call,func.bindetc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
thisdoes not reference a function's scope.thiswill reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined), which as you've said can be changed using.call()or.apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,thisand scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),thisand scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethisin an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthisnever refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
9
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing about
this in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing about
this in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions using
func.call, func.bind etc. – Sushil– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions using
func.call, func.bind etc. – Sushil– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
2
this does not reference a function's scope. this will reference a specific object (or possibly undefined), which as you've said can be changed using .call() or .apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
this does not reference a function's scope. this will reference a specific object (or possibly undefined), which as you've said can be changed using .call() or .apply(). A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,
this and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6), this and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (the this in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), but this never refers to a scope.– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,
this and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6), this and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (the this in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), but this never refers to a scope.– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Here is one good source of this in JavaScript.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
thisis thewindowobject
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
nodeusing the repl,thisis the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
nodeexecuting from a script,thisat the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this in a function that is not called with new references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;, in which case this will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new the this will be a new context, it will not reference the global this.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype property. You access those values using this.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval to access this.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with to add this to the current scope to read and write to values on this without referring to this explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Here is one good source of this in JavaScript.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
thisis thewindowobject
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
nodeusing the repl,thisis the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
nodeexecuting from a script,thisat the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this in a function that is not called with new references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;, in which case this will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new the this will be a new context, it will not reference the global this.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype property. You access those values using this.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval to access this.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with to add this to the current scope to read and write to values on this without referring to this explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Here is one good source of this in JavaScript.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
thisis thewindowobject
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
nodeusing the repl,thisis the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
nodeexecuting from a script,thisat the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this in a function that is not called with new references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;, in which case this will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new the this will be a new context, it will not reference the global this.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype property. You access those values using this.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval to access this.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with to add this to the current scope to read and write to values on this without referring to this explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
Here is one good source of this in JavaScript.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
thisis thewindowobject
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
nodeusing the repl,thisis the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
nodeexecuting from a script,thisat the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this in a function that is not called with new references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;, in which case this will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new the this will be a new context, it will not reference the global this.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype property. You access those values using this.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval to access this.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with to add this to the current scope to read and write to values on this without referring to this explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
edited Mar 25 '16 at 14:23
gnerkus
7,77743260
7,77743260
answered Nov 29 '15 at 6:01
zangwzangw
24.1k796116
24.1k796116
add a comment |
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - objel.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // objel.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - objel.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - objel.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // objel.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - objel.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - objel.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // objel.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - objel.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - objel.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // objel.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - objel.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
answered Apr 23 '13 at 12:57
Arman McHitarianArman McHitarian
2,89122631
2,89122631
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
edited Mar 3 '17 at 7:34
answered Jan 31 '17 at 8:29
Arup HoreArup Hore
83999
83999
add a comment |
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this value.
When having troubles identifying this, do not ask yourself:
Where is
thistaken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
thiswhere the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this value.
When having troubles identifying this, do not ask yourself:
Where is
thistaken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
thiswhere the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this value.
When having troubles identifying this, do not ask yourself:
Where is
thistaken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
thiswhere the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this and will save you from headache.
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this value.
When having troubles identifying this, do not ask yourself:
Where is
thistaken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
thiswhere the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this and will save you from headache.
edited Aug 22 '18 at 6:19
answered Nov 8 '16 at 12:17
Dmitri PavlutinDmitri Pavlutin
10.7k42731
10.7k42731
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
answered Jul 12 '16 at 19:03
James DrinkardJames Drinkard
9,7281281121
9,7281281121
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
answered Jun 28 '10 at 9:25
tathagatatathagata
417312
417312
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
1
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
answered Sep 16 '17 at 22:11
mrmaclean89mrmaclean89
29643
29643
add a comment |
add a comment |
this is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a() was executed in the global context which is the window.
With Constructor
this can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person() is executed, a completely new object is created. Person is called and its this is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new keyword, whatIsThis referes to the most global context it can find(window)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply().call()and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = thismeans in JavaScript
add a comment |
this is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a() was executed in the global context which is the window.
With Constructor
this can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person() is executed, a completely new object is created. Person is called and its this is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new keyword, whatIsThis referes to the most global context it can find(window)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply().call()and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = thismeans in JavaScript
add a comment |
this is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a() was executed in the global context which is the window.
With Constructor
this can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person() is executed, a completely new object is created. Person is called and its this is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new keyword, whatIsThis referes to the most global context it can find(window)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply().call()and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = thismeans in JavaScript
this is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a() was executed in the global context which is the window.
With Constructor
this can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person() is executed, a completely new object is created. Person is called and its this is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new keyword, whatIsThis referes to the most global context it can find(window)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply().call()and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = thismeans in JavaScript
edited May 23 '17 at 12:02
Community♦
11
11
answered Aug 9 '14 at 9:22
NipunaNipuna
2,60174071
2,60174071
add a comment |
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
edited Aug 7 '17 at 7:54
Bhargav Rao♦
31k2092114
31k2092114
answered Jul 3 '17 at 10:07
TrombeTrombe
13918
13918
add a comment |
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
answered Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Simon GroenewoltSimon Groenewolt
9,69312958
9,69312958
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
1
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports is just a reference to module.exports
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports is just a reference to module.exports
answered Jul 25 '18 at 7:04
unclexounclexo
1,307512
1,307512
add a comment |
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
answered Apr 6 '16 at 7:15
community wiki
PRADEEP SINGH Chundawat
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have a different take on this from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call.
If you just call a function then this is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectIn other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectwhich means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like + and - and *. There is also the dot operator which is .
The . operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barIn other words bar.foo() translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barAgain these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a for the property b. If b is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class keyword. For the purposes of this though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a for property b if it finds property b on the object or in it's prototype chain if b ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b references will be called using the call method and passing a as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this before calling another function and then call it with the . (dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); Following the translation to use call, obj.bar() becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);. When we enter the bar function we call foo but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this is that inner object.
This is what both bind and => functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar above that explicitly sets this before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this is set to whatever you pass to bind.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});Note that if functionObject.bind did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the => operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis but unlike bind the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this happens to be when the => operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo() translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj); which means the arrow operator inside foo will bind obj to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b. b() will work as it always has as b.call(window) or b.call(undefined) calling the new invisible function that foo created. That invisible function ignores the this passed into it and passes obj as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
I have a different take on this from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call.
If you just call a function then this is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectIn other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectwhich means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like + and - and *. There is also the dot operator which is .
The . operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barIn other words bar.foo() translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barAgain these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a for the property b. If b is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class keyword. For the purposes of this though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a for property b if it finds property b on the object or in it's prototype chain if b ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b references will be called using the call method and passing a as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this before calling another function and then call it with the . (dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); Following the translation to use call, obj.bar() becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);. When we enter the bar function we call foo but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this is that inner object.
This is what both bind and => functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar above that explicitly sets this before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this is set to whatever you pass to bind.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});Note that if functionObject.bind did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the => operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis but unlike bind the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this happens to be when the => operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo() translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj); which means the arrow operator inside foo will bind obj to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b. b() will work as it always has as b.call(window) or b.call(undefined) calling the new invisible function that foo created. That invisible function ignores the this passed into it and passes obj as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
I have a different take on this from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call.
If you just call a function then this is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectIn other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectwhich means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like + and - and *. There is also the dot operator which is .
The . operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barIn other words bar.foo() translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barAgain these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a for the property b. If b is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class keyword. For the purposes of this though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a for property b if it finds property b on the object or in it's prototype chain if b ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b references will be called using the call method and passing a as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this before calling another function and then call it with the . (dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); Following the translation to use call, obj.bar() becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);. When we enter the bar function we call foo but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this is that inner object.
This is what both bind and => functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar above that explicitly sets this before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this is set to whatever you pass to bind.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});Note that if functionObject.bind did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the => operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis but unlike bind the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this happens to be when the => operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo() translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj); which means the arrow operator inside foo will bind obj to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b. b() will work as it always has as b.call(window) or b.call(undefined) calling the new invisible function that foo created. That invisible function ignores the this passed into it and passes obj as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
I have a different take on this from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call.
If you just call a function then this is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectIn other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectwhich means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like + and - and *. There is also the dot operator which is .
The . operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barIn other words bar.foo() translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barAgain these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a for the property b. If b is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class keyword. For the purposes of this though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a for property b if it finds property b on the object or in it's prototype chain if b ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b references will be called using the call method and passing a as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this before calling another function and then call it with the . (dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); Following the translation to use call, obj.bar() becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);. When we enter the bar function we call foo but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this is that inner object.
This is what both bind and => functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar above that explicitly sets this before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this is set to whatever you pass to bind.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});Note that if functionObject.bind did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the => operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis but unlike bind the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this happens to be when the => operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo() translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj); which means the arrow operator inside foo will bind obj to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b. b() will work as it always has as b.call(window) or b.call(undefined) calling the new invisible function that foo created. That invisible function ignores the this passed into it and passes obj as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectfunction foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window objectconst bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barconst bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is barconst bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barconst bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is barfunction foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar(); function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});answered Jan 28 at 18:37
gmangman
49.2k17114207
49.2k17114207
add a comment |
add a comment |
Summary this Javascript:
- The value of
thisis determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
thisis determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (windowin global space) - In event listeners the value of
thisrefers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
newkeyword the value ofthisrefers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
thiswith the functions:call,apply,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.add a comment |
Summary this Javascript:
- The value of
thisis determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
thisis determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (windowin global space) - In event listeners the value of
thisrefers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
newkeyword the value ofthisrefers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
thiswith the functions:call,apply,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.add a comment |
Summary this Javascript:
- The value of
thisis determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
thisis determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (windowin global space) - In event listeners the value of
thisrefers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
newkeyword the value ofthisrefers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
thiswith the functions:call,apply,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.Summary this Javascript:
- The value of
thisis determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
thisis determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (windowin global space) - In event listeners the value of
thisrefers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
newkeyword the value ofthisrefers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
thiswith the functions:call,apply,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}<div class="foo">click me</div>function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.answered Aug 21 '18 at 17:12
Willem van der VeenWillem van der Veen
5,41533037
5,41533037
add a comment |
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike() function is printing the this.name which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object).
In the above code snippet, when function bike() gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike() call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike() gets called with the execution context as obj1 so this.name became obj1.name. Same with obj2.bike() call where the execution context of function bike() is obj2.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike() is an example of default binding. obj1.bike() and obj2.bike() are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1 but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike(), the context of execution is obj2 so obj2.name gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call() method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike() and bike.call(obj2) both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1 and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1); These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike() function is printing the this.name which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object).
In the above code snippet, when function bike() gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike() call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike() gets called with the execution context as obj1 so this.name became obj1.name. Same with obj2.bike() call where the execution context of function bike() is obj2.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike() is an example of default binding. obj1.bike() and obj2.bike() are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1 but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike(), the context of execution is obj2 so obj2.name gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call() method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike() and bike.call(obj2) both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1 and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1); These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike() function is printing the this.name which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object).
In the above code snippet, when function bike() gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike() call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike() gets called with the execution context as obj1 so this.name became obj1.name. Same with obj2.bike() call where the execution context of function bike() is obj2.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike() is an example of default binding. obj1.bike() and obj2.bike() are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1 but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike(), the context of execution is obj2 so obj2.name gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call() method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike() and bike.call(obj2) both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1 and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1); These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike() function is printing the this.name which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object).
In the above code snippet, when function bike() gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike() call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike() gets called with the execution context as obj1 so this.name became obj1.name. Same with obj2.bike() call where the execution context of function bike() is obj2.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike() is an example of default binding. obj1.bike() and obj2.bike() are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1 but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike(), the context of execution is obj2 so obj2.name gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call() method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike() and bike.call(obj2) both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1 and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1); These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
answered Mar 16 at 4:58
ashishashish
323110
323110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
edited Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
Suraj Rao
24k85973
24k85973
answered Nov 30 '18 at 6:00
PALLAMOLLA SAIPALLAMOLLA SAI
2906
2906
you missed a}in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
you missed a}in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
you missed a
} in point 4– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
you missed a
} in point 4– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
thispeter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation of
thiskeyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20